 Dog Soldiers:Fresh meat |
  |
 Nov 24 2005, 03:42 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Johnny Alpha  Group: Senior Members Posts: 76 Joined: 20-September 05 Member No.: 4,470  |
I have heard that this to be the second Dog Soldiers film and that its in production/due for release as we speak
Does anyone know if its any good? I love the first one as much as SOTD and I will be disapointed to find out that its a big pile of shit like Babylon 5 |
 |
 
|
|
Nov 24 2005, 04:06 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Walking the Plank Group: Senior Members Posts: 1,932 Joined: 4-October 04 From: ????????? Member No.: 2,357 |
I doubt it will be much more than straight to video baloney. Neil Marshall (one of the very very few British directors not commited to spending National Lottery funds on celluloid horseshit) has nowt to do with the film, its got some plot involving American soldiers
 . Rather than wait for this film go watch Neil Marshalls follow up film the Descent instead.
This post has been edited by ronlogan1977: Nov 24 2005, 04:08 AM |
|
|
|
|
Nov 24 2005, 08:22 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. Group: Senior Members Posts: 3,714 Joined: 30-March 05 From: Penicuik - ass-end of beyond Member No.: 3,744 |
I'm intrigued by it - I love the original (it's in my Top Ten fave movies of all time), so I'll want to see the sequel, but if it sucks balls....
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 24 2005, 09:38 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Four Pinter Group: Senior Members Posts: 578 Joined: 24-December 04 Member No.: 2,974 |
QUOTE (DazDaMan @ Nov 24 2005, 09:22 AM) I'm intrigued by it - I love the original (it's in my Top Ten fave movies of all time), so I'll want to see the sequel, but if it sucks balls....  It will suck balls. Neil Marshall has nothing to do with it for one thing. For another, half the fun of Dog Soldiers was how seat-of-the-pants everything was. It was a B-Movie with a bucketload of class. It should be used in film studies to demonstrate just how much you can squeeze out of a shoe-string budget. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 24 2005, 06:41 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Tyler Durden says .......use soap Group: Senior Members Posts: 188 Joined: 7-July 05 From: Nottingham Member No.: 4,180 |
I loved dog soldiers! and best of all it has Sean Pertwee (sp?) in it. he is THE MAN.
hes so cool in every film I've seen him in. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2005, 07:10 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Life's a grave, dig it. Group: Senior Members Posts: 4,030 Joined: 6-November 04 From: A spoon cupboard somewhere. Member No.: 2,711 |
Dog Soldiers = Pure Class
New Bollocks With Stupid Yankee Twats = Utter Shit |
|
|
|
| ozzy |
Nov 28 2005, 08:18 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Guests |
guy's this is'nt a load of dingos kydneys it's real
http://www.upcominghorrormovies.com/movies/dogsoldiers2.php how's that for a slice of fried gold eh? 
This post has been edited by ozzy: Nov 28 2005, 08:19 PM |
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 08:21 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Bully for you Group: Senior Members Posts: 20,419 Joined: 25-February 05 From: behind a desk, sitting very still Member No.: 3,498 |
Really don't think this film should ever see the light of day, frankly. The original is a seminal low-budget film that is such fun to watch, a sequel would just cheapen it. Especially since Neil Marshall isn't involved and he was such an important part of what made the original great. The cast were great as well, obviously, but the writing and directing were what really made it a fun film.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 10:09 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Addict Group: Senior Members Posts: 6,116 Joined: 16-March 05 From: Cardiff: "Capital City of The Future" Member No.: 3,662 |
This sounds almost as pony as the 28 days later sequel that's on the way. One to avoid I think.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 10:10 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. Group: Senior Members Posts: 3,714 Joined: 30-March 05 From: Penicuik - ass-end of beyond Member No.: 3,744 |
QUOTE (Sir_Robin_the_brave @ Nov 28 2005, 11:09 PM) This sounds almost as pony as the 28 days later sequel that's on the way. One to avoid I think. Eh? 
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 10:11 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. Group: Senior Members Posts: 3,714 Joined: 30-March 05 From: Penicuik - ass-end of beyond Member No.: 3,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 10:13 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Addict Group: Senior Members Posts: 6,116 Joined: 16-March 05 From: Cardiff: "Capital City of The Future" Member No.: 3,662 |
QUOTE (DazDaMan @ Nov 28 2005, 10:10 PM) Eh? This is what I'm referring to. Same cheap sequel not involving the original film-makers idea, which will probably suck as much as the new dog soldiers. EDIT Yup that's the one, it sounds like proper pishness. This post has been edited by Sir_Robin_the_brave: Nov 28 2005, 10:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 12:08 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Life's a grave, dig it. Group: Senior Members Posts: 4,030 Joined: 6-November 04 From: A spoon cupboard somewhere. Member No.: 2,711 |
Oh dear, 28 days later was bad enough but this...
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 12:09 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. Group: Senior Members Posts: 3,714 Joined: 30-March 05 From: Penicuik - ass-end of beyond Member No.: 3,744 |
QUOTE (fatseff1234 @ Nov 30 2005, 01:08 PM) Oh dear, 28 days later was bad enough but this... What was wrong with 28 Days Later??
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 01:00 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Life's a grave, dig it. Group: Senior Members Posts: 4,030 Joined: 6-November 04 From: A spoon cupboard somewhere. Member No.: 2,711 |
QUOTE (DazDaMan @ Nov 30 2005, 12:09 PM) What was wrong with 28 Days Later?? It was shit and there weren't any zombies. |
|
|
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 06:13 AM |