QUOTE (tigerlily @ May 10 2008, 10:14 PM)
I didn't mind Freema last year but she proved fairly weak next to Catherine Tate.
As much as I like Martha/Freema, she was completely redundant in that story. If they wanted a POV from the fish people they could have had Tate doing that, and I think it could have made a better story to have just the Doctor and Jenny playing off of each other.
QUOTE (Zoe @ May 11 2008, 03:38 AM)
OK, fair enough that you can make a clone, or one parented child or whatever, in less than a minute; but even suspending belief to the highest degree, do we really believe that progeny would have half-head highlights, lots of eyeliner and a stylish ensemble? Who put her bra and pants on?
Does that
really need explaining?
QUOTE (Everlong @ May 11 2008, 04:39 PM)
Jenny reminded me of that sally sparrow from 'Blink' last year, albeit a bit more trigger-happy.
My thought at the end the episode was "Well, that's put pay to any chance of Sally Sparrow ever returning (not that the chance was very high to start with, but . . .).
I wasn't hugely taken with the episode, as by and large I don't think it really bought anything new to the mix, past the invention of a "daughter" for the Doctor.
Did anyone watch Confidential afterwards? Davis and Collinson were positively wetting themselves with how pleased they were to be writing themselves into Who lore with that plot twist.
If they really wanted to do something with the Doctor and his family, he could have always revisited Susan or something, there's no reason she couldn't still be alive - after all, the quote was:
I shall come back some day . . .