Full Version: JJ Abrams Star Trek
I agree - Noel Clarke can't act. Or direct. Or write. And yes, I've seen both Kidulthood and Adulthood, and both were pretty wretched.
QUOTE (Serafina_Pekkala @ Jan 5 2012, 10:31 AM) 
Soon to be appearing in YOUR dreams. Alas, but not our pants.
He is taking over. Bless him - can't say I blame him for striking when the iron is hot. He'll be doing his Rickman impression on Craig Ferguson in a matter of weeks. Unless it has happened already.
The polar opposite to delightful bumbling Cumblepatch is Noel Fucking Clarke. Smug, self-absorbed, no sense of humour and a mediocre talent. My only hope he is only in it for 5 minutes. I would gladly spit in his coffee. Or maybe do a small poo.
Apparently Alice 'Big Tits' Eve is in it too. Something for the hetero males.
He is taking over. Bless him - can't say I blame him for striking when the iron is hot. He'll be doing his Rickman impression on Craig Ferguson in a matter of weeks. Unless it has happened already.
The polar opposite to delightful bumbling Cumblepatch is Noel Fucking Clarke. Smug, self-absorbed, no sense of humour and a mediocre talent. My only hope he is only in it for 5 minutes. I would gladly spit in his coffee. Or maybe do a small poo.
Apparently Alice 'Big Tits' Eve is in it too. Something for the hetero males.
I don't want him in my pants. Or dreams.
Re Noel Clarke, didn't mind him in Doctor Who. That's aboot it.
QUOTE (Kick in the Head @ Jan 5 2012, 02:41 PM)
I agree - Noel Clarke can't act. Or direct. Or write. And yes, I've seen both Kidulthood and Adulthood, and both were pretty wretched.
Exactly. I heard him taking credit for Attack the Block on Kermode and Mayo's film review. Unbelievable.
QUOTE (Kick in the Head @ Jan 5 2012, 02:41 PM)
Or write.
He did write the best episode in the first series of Torchwood! [/thatsnotactuallysayingverymuch]
QUOTE (Serafina_Pekkala @ Jan 5 2012, 05:36 PM)
Exactly. I heard him taking credit for Attack the Block on Kermode and Mayo's film review. Unbelievable.
Yeah, it was a bit cheeky, suggesting it would never have been made without him. It's not that I have a problem with "yoof cinema or whatevs", but whereas Kidulthood had some interesting elements, when his character takes centre stage in Adulthood (no surprises being that he's on directorial duty this time round), it's just an indulgent, boring, depressing mess.
First on-set picture.
Good to see some lens flare action there!
ETA:
Not from the new film as it turns out, but from the first film - Bad Digital Spy . . .
Good to see some lens flare action there!
ETA:
Not from the new film as it turns out, but from the first film - Bad Digital Spy . . .
The new film is to be called:
Star Trek Into Darkness
Not really sure what to make of that . . .
More here: Sequel Title Confirmed – ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’.
Star Trek Into Darkness
Not really sure what to make of that . . .
More here: Sequel Title Confirmed – ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’.
I wonder if Batman will sue Star Fleet. 
More coat based acting from Cumberbatch I see.
QUOTE (Serafina_Pekkala @ Dec 3 2012, 12:14 PM)
More coat based acting from Cumberbatch I see.
I'm curious how they'll squeeze Smaug into a coat.
/Hobbit Not Star Trek.
Smaug has a coat of gold, from sitting on his horde for so long.
QUOTE (GundamGuy_UK @ Dec 3 2012, 12:50 PM)
Smaug has a coat of gold, from sitting on his horde for so long.
Well played.
Must be one of Cumberbatch's terms. "Character must have long coat, and wind to blow coat".
QUOTE (Raven @ Dec 3 2012, 10:42 AM)
How can you tell it's London?
Isn't that the Gherkin on the right?
Opens on my birthday!
QUOTE (NiteFall @ Dec 3 2012, 08:48 PM)
Isn't that the Gherkin on the right?
That has to be the best sentence I've read today.
QUOTE (monkeyman @ Dec 3 2012, 08:18 PM)
How can you tell it's London?
QUOTE (NiteFall @ Dec 3 2012, 08:48 PM)
Isn't that the Gherkin on the right?
And the London Eye on the left. And if you look very closely you can see St. Pauls beside the Gherkin.
Ah fair enough, I was looking at a much smaller picture so couldn't see them
QUOTE (Raven @ Dec 6 2012, 01:36 PM)
*whimper*
SO excited.
It looks great - although sometimes it is very BSG.
Cumberbatch may want to knock the ciggies on the head for a while. Or else he will turn into John Hurt.
Cumberbatch may want to knock the ciggies on the head for a while. Or else he will turn into John Hurt.
It does look promising.
I'm not entirely convinced Cumberbatch is Gary Mitchell, although Alice Eve does seem to be doing a very passible impression of Elizabeth Dehnar. Why would he need a gun, if he were?
I'm not entirely convinced Cumberbatch is Gary Mitchell, although Alice Eve does seem to be doing a very passible impression of Elizabeth Dehnar. Why would he need a gun, if he were?
From what I remember of the episode Where No Man Has Gone Before his powers develop slowly, so that could explain the gun. If he is playing Gary Mitchell that is.
QUOTE (NiteFall @ Dec 6 2012, 08:03 PM)
From what I remember of the episode Where No Man Has Gone Before his powers develop slowly, so that could explain the gun. If he is playing Gary Mitchell that is.
True, and he does loose them during the story as well.
Hmm. Not bad, but not as good as the last one. Far too much fan-wank for my liking.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.